{"id":30533,"date":"2020-08-21T12:54:54","date_gmt":"2020-08-21T12:54:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tugraztestweb.asol.at\/gesamtverzeichnis\/unkategorisiert\/planning-capital-cities-belgrade-bucharest-sofia-2\/"},"modified":"2020-08-21T14:55:54","modified_gmt":"2020-08-21T12:55:54","slug":"planning-capital-cities-belgrade-bucharest-sofia-ebook","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/tugraztestweb.asol.at\/en\/gesamtverzeichnis\/architektur\/planning-capital-cities-belgrade-bucharest-sofia-ebook\/","title":{"rendered":"Planning Capital Cities: Belgrade, Bucharest, Sofia"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Deutsch<\/a>.<\/p>

The aim of the publication is to detect some uniform ideas in the
\nurbanism of Belgrade, Bucharest and Sofia and to point out equal ideas
\nas marks of the uniformity. The assumption that the urbanism of the
\nthree capitals shows semantic links is based on some frame conditions,
\noffering arguments for a cultural unification: The primary factor for
\nthe similarity is the regional neighborhood as a factor for co-existence
\n and interferences. The secondary factor is the comparable urban
\nhistory. Both factors are a precondition for a similar urban shape
\norganization and a cultural heritage in its broad sense. Some historical
\n facts offer convincing arguments for the analogy and, respectively,
\ntheir differentiation from the Central and Western European capitals and
\n examination as related objects of research: the Ottoman rule as the
\npre-modern period, the delayed infiltration of the capitalist economy
\nand nation building, the European cultural influences, dominating since
\nthe 19th century and finally the unstable geopolitical order of the
\nregion, which reflects on the principles of urbanism. The review is
\ncarried on chronologically and points out the approximation and
\ndissociation of the ideas in the urbanism of the capitals phase-wise. <\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Deutsch<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The aim of the publication is to detect some uniform ideas in the
\nurbanism of Belgrade, Bucharest and Sofia and to point out equal ideas
\nas marks of the uniformity. The assumption that the urbanism of the
\nthree capitals shows semantic links is based on some frame conditions,
\noffering arguments for a cultural unification: The primary factor for
\nthe similarity is the regional neighborhood as a factor for co-existence
\n and interferences. The secondary factor is the comparable urban
\nhistory. Both factors are a precondition for a similar urban shape
\norganization and a cultural heritage in its broad sense. Some historical
\n facts offer convincing arguments for the analogy and, respectively,
\ntheir differentiation from the Central and Western European capitals and
\n examination as related objects of research: the Ottoman rule as the
\npre-modern period, the delayed infiltration of the capitalist economy
\nand nation building, the European cultural influences, dominating since
\nthe 19th century and finally the unstable geopolitical order of the
\nregion, which reflects on the principles of urbanism. The review is
\ncarried on chronologically and points out the approximation and
\ndissociation of the ideas in the urbanism of the capitals phase-wise. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":39976,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"yoast_head":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\t\n